A male was imprisoned for manslaughter after strangling his boyfriend. On his release he attempted to rape a female and was imprisoned for life. During the second term, he began changing his sex, - hormone induced breasts and beard removed (by electrolysis?).
Now he wants to be transferred to a women's prison. This isn't a joke. It is happening now and we are paying.
The prisoner says doctors have forbidden him from having a full sex change until he lives as a woman for a long period, which will be impossible in a male prison. As a result the killer has launched a legal fight to be transferred to a female prison.
The transsexual claims his current incarceration among men is a violation of his right to respect for his private life, as set down in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. (I wondered when that would be brought up)
The Justice Department is having to use more TAXPAYER's money to point out that women prisoners are unlikely to welcome a pre-operative transsexual jailed for raping a woman. (Just in case anyone didn't think that already)
This the Human Rights Act in action. The 'claimant' is nearly always someone that either should not be here in the first place a prisoner or someone who would be in prison if there was any justice. The action is nearly always paid for by legal aid, which is another way of saying that the Govt pay for the claimant to take action against them.
Note to the next PM. Get rid of the Human Rights Act. It only ever helps the wrong people
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
XX until he lives as a woman for a long period,XX
ReplyDeleteWhat? Like...wash the dishes, clean the kitchen, cook, do the washing, iron the shirts, take the dog for a walk... What?
Von Brandenburg-Preußen.
...or squeezing the toothpaste tube in the middle and leaving the toilet seat down
ReplyDeleteQuite.
ReplyDeletevB-P
I think David Cameron said they'd bin the HRA.
ReplyDeleteHRA was brought in to provide work for lawyers like Tony Blair. Oh and didnt his elephant haunched duck faced wife set a HRA legal practice as well?
Its not news that the likes of Blair only care about themselves and their money grabbing lawyer friends.
TheCogitator said...
ReplyDeleteI think David Cameron said they'd bin the HRA.
Another politicians sound bite that the Mail/Sun/Mirror/Star brigade, with I.Qs approaching their shoe size may fall for, but unless Cameron is advocating leaving the E.U you are stuck with it.
Especialy remembering that great swathes of the E.U H.R.A are BASED on the British one.
Von Brandenburg-Preußen
Part fo the problem is that the HRA was drafted just after WW2, but left on the shelf for 50 years. A lot of what it says is relevant to what was happening in the 1930s and 40s (and what is happening now in Zimbabwe), but not relevant to what happens now in the UK.
ReplyDeleteThere are no summary executions or death camps heer last time I looked.
*HRA was brought in to provide work for lawyers like Tony Blair* - 'Cherie' who is on £200.000 a year
These people ahve no shame; using the noble and worthwhile issue of human rights to make petty counter-culture points at huge public expense whilst the daughter-selling, sister-strangling mediaeval nutters insist that we change our ways towards Islam.
ReplyDeleteTotal joke and - as you pointed out above - a money spinner for th elikes of Cherie Blair, the girl-bagger's champion.
Got a link to that story?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1201947/Transsexual-killer-Keeping-mens-prison-violates-human-rights.html
ReplyDelete